Pure Strain of Evil

In order to do the required analysis to isolate what was making our "nominally Christian" societies "nominally work" (so that I could also find out what was making the defects of our societies - ie Christian rapists etc - tick), I needed a pure strain of evil - that only Islam, not Buddhism etc, could provide. Without Islam, I simply couldn't have diagnosed the problem. I needed these people to keep attacking so I could bounce questions off them (or their supporters), to find out the underlying genes.

The internet provided the environment for me to access sufficient quantities of evil in order to make the diagnosis.

Anyway, here's a poor guy who has to live amongst it. There are many such people who know the truth in the Middle East. Memri has stacks of them. You can see them for yourself. Just click on "reform".

Anyway, here it is:

In my opinion, we should not describe these people as deviant. This is the product of our culture.


They are the product of a culture that believes the other does not deserve to live, and is an absolute enemy with whom no understanding is possible.


There is a fundamental flaw in our culture that leads to this behavior. This ideology, which was advocated by Sayyid Qutb, and which is implemented by those who kill innocent people - women, children, and people who have done nothing wrong - did not emerge out of thin air, but is the product of this culture. This is a one-dimensional culture, a culture of tyranny - tyranny in culture, in politics, in society, in the family, and in everything.


The "other" does not have to be someone completely different. When we disagree with someone, even over minor iussues regarding ritual purity, we regard him as the "other," we boycott him, we excommunicate him, defame him, level accusations at him, and so on.

Tyranny of course is not quite the right word to be using. An inherent, purely natural (genetic) desire to subjugate - a survival trait not appropriate in the 21st century - but in a modern liberal democracy it has been suppressed - except for the occasional rapist etc.




Boundaries of Freedom being defined

Man, how can the world be anything other than a computer simulation based on B-grade movies for entertainment purposes when we have headlines like Hamas crackdown on radical group from the BBC?

So we have the Party of God vs the Army of the Helpers of God, both doing the exact opposite of what any decent god would want them to do. Any decent god would be allied with the coalition and local soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, not some really nasty piece of work in the Gaza Strip.

Speaking of which. We are just now seeing just how much lasting freedom has been established in Iraq.

The Iraqi government is making moves to censor various things, and journalists are protesting. Note that blocking porn is not unusual, and Australia has unfortunately has or had censorship like that too. I consider that to be a violation of my human rights too. Regardless, this democratic process will decide how free Iraq stays, and even if it goes backwards a bit, the democratic process also opens the door to going forwards again. That is the fantastic thing that the US et al did when they smashed down the door. Only idiots were expecting overnight Utopia without any difficulty. It was enough to just allow the ball to start rolling. Actually, when Saddam's statue fell, Iraq was the most free country in the world. No censorship of any sort. No draconian or unjust or illogical laws of any form. The Iraqi people can and did say whatever they wanted.

Good news also from Iraqi Kurdistan, where the opposition party has now got 23% of the vote. Fantastic stuff having some increasingly credible opposition.

One thing I'm really interested in seeing is what the Iraqi people will choose on 30th January, 2010. We have opinion poll results, but they are a bit dodgy without some supporting secret ballot. We don't know for sure that people are giving their true opinions in polls, because of the hostile environment they live in (hostile to pro-US opinions). This isn't confined to Iraq either. In the past, intimidation of white people in America was so high that people were afraid to say that they were going to choose something other than the black candidate, that they would lie on opinion polls. That's why the last election was so much more difficult to predict. Needed to see the secret ballot results to find out what Americans REALLY thought about a guy who would let his children get their "spiritual upbringing" from the likes of Mr God Damn America.

Anyway, on that note, let me stress. For all the fear that I had about Obama deliberately throwing Iraq like the Democrats did to Vietnam, he turned out to be a swell guy after all. Thankyou Obama. I don't know why you're doing it, and I'll just give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that underneath the radical-appealing exterior, you're really a decent guy making sure the Iraqis remain frame. I'll furthermore assume that the indoctrination classes you sent your kids to were just a smokescreen, and that you sacrificed your own children to snare victory in Iraq. I hope that after the dust has settled you'll spill the beans, and reverse any anti-white hatred your children picked up at "church". I'm more worried about Iraq not suffering from a military coup than anti-white attacks in America. If we can secure the rest of the world as priority, we can then concentrate on the forces stirring up hatred of whites in America. Freedom in the other countries will allow the opinion that white people are humans too and deserve human rights too to be allowed to be voiced. Until then, keep up the pretence, and just keep Iraq free. That is the important thing to do, that is the good action, and I will judge you by your actions rather than the apparent crap you tell your radical and racist supporters.




Change We Can Believe In

Well, I certainly didn't expect Obama to usher in any "change we can believe in". I mean, he opposed the real change in Iraq. Fundamental and radical change in the world. So what could he possibly have of any interest?

Well, what a shock it was to see him say what needed to be said for decades. Here is a window into the truth:

"But that's not a reason to get bad grades, that's not a reason to cut class, that's not a reason to give up on your education and drop out of school".

You'd think it would be obvious, but apparently not. Imagine that. A politician with the guts to tell blacks to take personal responsibility for their own crimes/mistakes/faults instead of trying to lay everything on the nearest white scapegoat. The closest Bush could manage was mentioning "the soft bigotry of low expectations". He didn't have the guts to speak the truth to racist blacks.

Quite frankly I never expected Obama to do that after this crap at election time. Honestly, the response from Cold Fury is like poetry. Once again we have a continuation of the exact same clash of worldviews.

"The idiotic radical premises underlying the question are unleavened balderdash, based on moonbat conspiracy theories, paranoia, and, frankly, plain old horseshit."

"They just aren’t listening, and they never will be; they’re unpersuadable on any point that conflicts with their fossilized prejudices, and it’s just not worth a moment’s bother."

I must say that it took me years to get that myself. I was convinced that people would change their view if I could isolate the point of dispute down to an easily-digestable piece of logic.

Unfortunately I overestimated humans. The wall-to-wall dogma in their brains is completely and utterly impenetrable.

Oh well, at least computers respond to logic, so I've been kicking arse back in my traditional campaign (producing a more efficient computer industry - or at least, putting the fundamentals of the same out there so that people can adopt it if they want - basically the equivalent of message 666 for the World Peace that people pretend to want, and like to pretend that "World Non-combat" is the same thing).

I'll blog about that one day, now that the essentials are pretty much wrapped up and I'm not expecting much more for basically the rest of my life. It's all basically been done and there's just variations/refinements to go on top of it in a process of continual refinement. Not much different from the Holy Book of Mu'tazilah in fact. Essentials in place already. Plenty of room for improvement, but the fundamentals are pretty sound.

Basically if you want to fix the world, you need a plan. I now have a plan for World Freedom, World Peace, human rights, global village, global computing. It's all a lot different from what Marx came up with, but it's basically the alternative blueprint. The fact that Marx got millions of passionate followers, while I didn't? Well, history can explain that one. Poor old Churchill couldn't even get the bloody Brits to *vote* for him after he just saved the friggin planet. What can I say? Could be worse. He could have been put under house arrest like poor old Galileo. Aya aya aya.




Bring It On

Ah, finally we've got the terrorists' attention. What a shame it happened on Rudd's shift instead of Howard's.

The worldview that came up with this statement:

"Your army kills innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan and Israel takes Palestinian land by force."

came head to head with the worldview that pricks like him killed innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan and Israel.

The clash of worldviews this time took place in Melbourne instead of Baghdad, but it's the exact same war on the exact same planet.

People keep complaining about the misnomer "War on Terror". What would you rather call it? War on Stupid Worldviews Held By Dogmatic Individuals?

The important thing is the concept. The concept is that this is an ideological war, being fought worldwide, much like communism was in fact, and ideologies do not stop at national boundaries. (Unless you have an ideology that is in fact - stop at national boundaries - an artificial and relatively recent (in human history) innovation). The other important concept is that if you wish to attack our American or Afghan or Iraqi or Israeli allies - you can do it over our dead bodies - literally.

I wish all Australians shared that view, but sadly, not all Australians have souls. However, sufficient Australians had souls, and know what it's like to have something worth dying for, that Howard was elected for long enough to be able to stick it in the terrorists' eyes.

And that's a good thing.

Bring it on.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?