Anti-Subjugator

I went to Cumberland Hospital today to pick up medication, and as I was nearly there I saw some birds (two non-budgie species) dive-bombing a budgie. I intervened on the budgie's side by standing near it chasing away approaching birds. I also held out my finger for the bird to land on if it wanted true Close Air Support. To my surprise, the budgie didn't waste any time and flew to my finger.

I then continued to the hospital, but by the time I got there, the bird had moved onto my shoulder. It continued to stay with me while I got the medication, and my intention was to take it back to where we met, then I was going to sit with the bird until it felt like leaving. However, shortly before we returned to the same spot, it decided to jump off and inspect the road, and then a short while later flew off.

So that is very interesting power dynamics. It also shows that I am an anti-speciesist. I am willing to have a relationship with another species. God making friends with another species is the equivalent of the One True God doing inter-universe travel.

Once again terrorists have targetted American civilians successfully. If they had a nuclear bomb, they would have used that instead.

As I have previously stated - all this anti-Americanism in the world needs to be cleaned up. Hostile governments and people need to be eliminated. Americans have a basic human right to not live in fear.

The enemy needs to be clearly identified (ie message 666) and then the full force of the US military needs to be applied. And we should stop counting dead soldiers as a great tragedy. Soldiers exist to take the heavy blows. At the moment we are basically shielding soldiers with civilians. ie it is better for civilians in Boston to die rather than soldiers in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, death-by-car-accident blows both figures away. This is all very simple maths. We just need someone to make the case, and for the public to accept it.

The French have lifted their game. After disappointment (no show) in Iraq, and backing the dictator in Tunisia, it seems that the French have turned over a new leaf (starting with Libya), and we should be congratulating them for that.

They made a decision to go into Mali - a former colony, and of course they won easily. This is a template that needs to be followed as it produces a massive revamp. If at all possible, the Anglophones should just sit back and watch France do what is necessary. The Anglophones can assist France if France requests help. Otherwise, it's France's time to shine.

I doubt France will have the balls to go to Zimbabwe though, which is something that is required. It would be really nice to see France in there though. It would make the world look nice. France as a global liberation force, setting the gold standard.

For the record, I bent over backwards to try to save Osama bin Laden from getting killed. Firstly, the US and allies certainly had a right to kill him. I don't expect that everyone can bend over backwards to the same extent as me, which is why we have war.

But if it was up to me, we would have tried to bring Osama in from the cold. From a position of strength, we could have gotten everyone in the free world to agree that they are Muslims, following the Sufi or Mu'tazilah sect, and change the whole equation. Watch Osama react to that development.

Osama is merely a product of his environment. He was not evil, he had just been led down a wrong path, and never had the brain power or courage to rid himself of his childhood indoctrination.

A religious war in the year 2001 was something that people in the West couldn't even comprehend. In the West, religion is just a personal choice. But Osama's brain was not in the year 2001 of the Gregorian calendar. Osama's brain was centuries prior. That's not a reason to hate him. That's a reason for fixing the education system in the Middle East. They can start by explaining how bad the Middle Eastern dictators are, compared to Israel's liberal democracy.

Osama bin Laden should be loved as much as you would love a beautiful lion that ate your child. He was a natural animal.

However, since no-one is going to listen to me and convert to Islam the same way I did, we must return to the war. But let it be known that obstinate Christians are choosing war over peace, as is their right, but this is a hypocritical stance given Jesus's pacifist teachings. Let's face it. The world needs Jesus to give the nod to perpetual war against non-humanists. But try to change as many non-humanists as possible so they don't need to be killed. Understand them.

It is possible that the wars between England and France were over which language should be the lingua franca. And now we have a new war between English and Chinese.

I am glad that English seems to have won that war. My loyalty is mostly to the English language. I made a decision a long time ago that anyone who didn't speak English wasn't worth knowing. That is the extreme arrogance of an English-speaker, and that arrogance is something that I normally wouldn't tolerate from anyone, including myself.

But it was an empty threat. I didn't really want to exclude non-English speakers, although I did have an expectation that they learn the international language. After I had finished bouncing ideas off English-speakers, and STILL not gaining any following on my blog, I decided it was time to ensure that non-English-speakers were accurately represented by the English-speaking people from that country. ie to make sure that a non-English-speaking Chinese person was identical in every way to an English-speaking Chinese person, and that the only difference was a minor point that they spoke one less language.

But freedom, and my ideas, are so important that I couldn't leave anything to chance. So I went and downloaded and installed QQ and started contacting Chinese speakers. Since Chinese is the weaker (female) language, as a male it was polite for me to defer to the female, and so I used google translate to introduce myself in Chinese.

This is the proper way for the strong to approach the weak, in any aspect of life. Defer to the weaker party, unless the weaker party is evil and needs to be defeated. In the case of Chinese individuals (male or female), the right thing to do was defer to them. QQ was their software, and I was a guest in their country, basically. The absolute wrong thing was to throw my weight around and call them idiots for not learning English. Especially when dealing with females.

The absolute best thing I could do was to not just say to them "Hello. Do you speak English?", but to put everything into their beautiful (but impractical) characters. So that's what I did, translating again and again until I saw if I could convince non-English-speakers to follow my ideas and eventually follow my religion. That was an untapped group - non-English-speaking people. If I could get in via them I would be in a position to be able to say "first!".

One thing I seem to remember from my communication via QQ is that one of them said "Han" as an introduction to me. Which made me suspicious that I was part of a botnet, and everyone was playing a game of who had the superior race. I responded to that with "anti-racist" (in English), basically telling the racist Chinese to go fuck himself. ASIO/CIA apparently wised up after that and started intercepting my communication so that I didn't encounter any more "Han-ers". But it was too late. I had already imparted the concept of self-identifying as an anti-racist to the Chinese, so the Chinese may have everything they need now to avoid getting nuked and to becoming the number 1 country in the world. Ball's in their court now. And this is why I tried to defect to the Chinese embassy too. I want to make sure the Chinese have been given every chance to reform before a decision is made to nuke them off the planet.


P.S. When I was in France touring, I used to say "Excuse moi. Parlez vous Anglais?" (Excuse me. Do you speak English?).

Here is my latest hypothesis for the nature of the universe. It is a dance.

In the same way that mathematics could exist without an actual universe, I believe thought can exist without an actual universe. Ie something similar to when we dream. The characters in our dreams can probe their universe too, but ultimately their universe is completely a thought process. It doesn't correspond to anything physical, if that concept even exists.

Now contemplate the initial thought. Imagine you woke up in a dark room and your memory had been wiped such that you didn't know how got there. You might even be blind. You haven't opened your eyes yet. Other people may not exist. You can't even speak English. Scary thought? That's what would have faced the Initial Thought. For the purposes of this conversation, you can call that a god. So Initial God. Or simply "sentience". It doesn't need to be a physical being - indeed, there's no such thing as physical at this stage. What would you do if you awoke in such a terrible situation? All you can do is think.

Someone once said I would not make a good lawyer, because I argued both sides of the case. It's basically possible to argue with yourself. On this blog I have previously ripped into my own writing from decades prior. Sometimes I will adopt a position just to see what the hell happens. What pushback/arguments I get.

Anyway, here is what I would suggest as a course of action if you ever find yourself in that situation. Separate your "brain" into male and female portions. Or left-brain and right-brain. Same thing. The male half of the brain is designed to react without hesitation to input. The female half is designed to consider things in more detail. Each side takes it in turns to construct an imaginary (but note: imaginary = real) universe, via a series of "I believe" statements. Both sides must agree to every "I believe" statement, otherwise the universe must be destroyed and go back to the last point where they both agreed. They would be constructing different universes if they didn't agree.

For ease of reference, you can call these two divisions Adam and Eve.

Adam and Eve then begin a torturous process of explaining what the world looks like. Either party can refuse to continue, so neither party can harm the other. So, there are things like "I believe we live on a planet.". The other person needs to ask "What's a planet?". "It's a big round object". "Ok, I believe that too. How many planets exist?". "Planets are arranged in groups, called a solar system.".

Everything you see today - humans, animals, plants - are all constructed via such statements of belief. The beliefs then included "I believe males and females have a collective consciousness". Ideas are exchanged between any male and any female.

In 2011 my brain was reacting to what it perceived as the imminent destruction of the universe, due to the unsustainable construction that had been erected. Overpopulation etc. The females wanted a world where money was put into beautifying the planet. Men wanted to continue fighting each other until someone won. Neither side could agree to the state that the planet was in, so it was time to destroy this universe and start again. A never-ending story. With males and females potentially swapping roles for the next iteration. Anyway, as a male, I could see that the female version was unsustainable because they had failed to take into account the potential threat from exoplanets. So I rushed outside to tell the nearest female that they needed to defer to men on matters of war, because they would have allowed the entire planet to be enslaved by another planet. They accepted this and we got an extension on the universe.

In 2012 destruction was imminent again, because the world was still unsustainable, but I was again able to negotiate an acceptable dance, where women did not need to be afraid of being weaker than men. They can accept men being stronger, and we can continue this universe, so long as it is in the nature of men to ask the woman for her opinion before making a decision.

Statement of belief: I believe we live in a universe where it is in men's nature to defer to the woman whenever reasonably possible (ie without the man becoming a slave himself).

Anyway, the moral of the story is that whenever a man and a woman meet, there is a dance to be followed, if you look closely. There is always a mutually acceptable outcome to be negotiated, and the world progresses when this is derived.


P.S. CONCEPTS can exist without an actual universe. And different people, or groups, or countries, can represent different concepts. It is then possible to MARRY CONCEPTS. What I have been doing all my life is marrying logic with creativity, and then saying that I wish to represent both. But, there is another concept - BEAUTY. And the universe sans me represents beauty. And I represent ugliness. I willingly take on that burden so that we can have a marriage between the beauty and the beast. The universe, for all its faults, has a beautiful side. So do I, but let's not go there. :-)

In my judgement, the world is not a safe place for white people. The anti-white racism that blames completely innocent white babies for slavery from centuries ago, is also very likely to simply enslave whites when it gets power via democracy. I would never have children in a situation like this. I'd rather whites simply died out. My only hope is that I personally will die before the enslavement begins.

Some whites are stupid enough to think that by glorifying an anti-white racist terrorist like Mandela that they will be spared from enslavement. Good luck with that theory. Risk your own kids with that, I'm certainly not risking mine. My suggestion for whites is to manage their own extermination. It is possible to be exterminated without being enslaved. Set up a safe place for whites, in the same way that Israel was set up to be a safe place for Jews.

The UK is an obvious place, as it is an island, and it has nukes. The plan would be for whites to flee from each racist haven such as Zimbabwe and South Africa, to the UK, where they would occupy an increasingly small territory until London is all that exists. Then launch all of the UK's nukes at London to ensure that every single white is wiped out. It is crucial that anyone with any white in them at all is guaranteed to be exterminated, as a life of slavery is worse than no life at all.

Of course most whites will be too stupid to heed this advice, and prefer to take their chances with the grovelling to racist terrorists. Fine. I should be dead in 40 years so I don't have to watch the horror personally, as it shouldn't be possible for the demographics to change so much in 40 years. I hope technology doesn't increase to the point that life can be extended too far either, as my dream is to simply die peacefully in my sleep without having to think about the horrible world earth is destined to become due to racism. Not just racism against whites, but the unstated racism against blacks from other races, that would see them repeat (or ignore) the same failed policies in Africa. Or the failure to give a shit about Iraqi women being raped by their own government under Saddam.

Honestly, just get me out of this hellhole already. I've had enough.

Oh yeah, here is a great example of an anti-white comment that the world is full of:

"worst human rights violators in the world" coming from white Australians - that's rich

A white Australian, who most likely has zero history of violating anyone's human rights, made a comment that the tribal people killing defective children is considered barbaric. First of all, I don't even agree with him. I have no problem with people killing defective children before they become self-aware. The tribes do not have the luxury of having a social security system to take care of them either. Non-viable children should not be brought to self-awareness, in my opinion. But regardless, this other white Australian has a different opinion. And he has basically been told he is not allowed to express that opinion, because of his skin colour, and also because of his skin colour he is inherently a human rights abuser.

I repeat. Stop this planet, I'm out of this dump. I blame God for creating racists. So now I call on God to give me a quick painless death. I just want to die in my sleep. I leave behind my personal ideology, which will be ignored, but no genetic offspring (thankfully).